An alternate path: Community living experiments in the city
Cooperatives. Communes. Intentional communities. Utopian experiments.
Whenever the idea of “living in community” gets thrown out, at least one and (more likely) all of these terms will inevitably appear in the conversation. “Utopian” risks sounding naïve in the cynical, postmodern era, and “commune” is often flat-out wrong (properly, it’s only used to describe communities that pool all their finances, which most do not).
But many urban college graduates are feeling the call to a lifestyle beyond the single-bedroom apartment with neighbors who rarely exchange conversation. And some of the more idealistic-minded are answering it by living in communities dedicated to a larger cause.
It’s not unheard of. It’s hardly even rare. The Fellowship for Intentional Communities lists over 450 such households or neighborhoods in cities across the United States. And although it uses a fairly broad classification (some are still forming, and some have only a few members), examples of like-minded people forming communities with a higher goal in mind aren’t difficult to find.
Young graduates are starting to emerge at the forefront of the movement. In New York, a group of college grads formed Nickel City Housing Corporation when they maxed out their credit cards and drained their life savings to purchase their first dilapidated building in Buffalo. They spent the next several years inhabiting and renovating it to bring more positive attention to the area. On the other side of the country, a group of students seeking to continue living in community after college launched a similar project in Berkeley. They called the organization Cooperative Roots and proceeded to christen their first two houses Fort Awesome and Fort Radical.
None of them (unless otherwise mentioned) would call themselves communes. Members have their own incomes, their own jobs, and their own personal lives. What they trade is a fraction of their personal space for something they believe is better – a 24-hour support group and the chance to make a bigger difference than they could by themselves.
“By being a visible representative of community living in an area, it says that this is not something that is insane, this is not something that’s a cult-like thing to do,” said Michael Gallisdorfer, the 28-year-old president of Nickel City. “Anyone could do it. It’s not crazy to have kids who live together. It’s something you or anyone could do if they wanted to.”
- Coming out atheist: young nonbelievers build community in college and online
- A Fusion of Technology and Communication
- Catholic march draws crowds but not youth
- Baptism at the beach
- The Big Ten: Theosophy and the new age for ‘new age’
Related Stories on Shift
Tags: Chicago, community, multimedia















November 8th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
I was unaware of the Interantional Communities that are forming in the United States. They are different than the communes of the ’60s and ’70s, and thank you for clarifying that so well. The map helps in knowing they are coast to coast though not everywhere.
Now for some questions—What are they doing together, like does each have a particular cause or emphisis? Also, how do they govern themselves? Since each has their own job, income, and I’m guessing place to live, where is the community aspect. Is it governed like a condo association or a little more than that?
Thanks